Opening it up makes no difference if it wont run. CPU's need to be stronger, VR needs to be able to handle much higher res, and arma needs to utilize more than 1 proc.VR needs another 5 years+ before it's ready for prime time.and this comes from a real VR fan with lots of time in MSFS VR, which is basically the limit of what you can do in vr right now (albeit kinda half-arsed). We understand.not sure you do VR though.do you understand that in order to get 4k in VR you need to proc 8K in reality? The minimum you would need right now is to proc 4k and that is just for the graphics having nothing to do with the heavy cpu loads that the terrain processing, AI and armored vehicles require. With reprojection it is sufficient not to get below 45 fps. Even in arma3 a lot was possible, even weapon handling via motion controller:Ĭlaiming that you have to reduce the view distance, graphics or depth of the game so that it runs in VR can only come from people who don't do VR themselves. The Developers just need to allow access to their engine.
#VR SUPPORTED VS VR ONLY MOD#
There is nothing wrong with letting the mod community create VR mods. ArmA VR needs to be a proper VR shooter, which unlike flightsims is a very different beast from the regular thing. Yes, you can have a simple port, like Skyrim VR, but we should aim for something more than that. Most other controls will have to be similar to the console version, admittedly designing for a gamepad is already a factor, so hopefully that won't be a big issue. So, it wouldn't be fair to put VR players in the same server with pancake ones. OTOH, your marksmanship will go to pot, because it'll now depend on what you physically do with your rifle. You no longer need controls to bring up the gun, since all weapon handling is taken care of by moving your controllers.
For instance, you no longer need to toggle stances, this is accomplished by just changing your actual stance (measured by height of the headset from the floor). The problem is, the VR shooter gameplay is just too different. I'd propose an "ArmA VR", a separate title that would use the same assets and be able to take most of ArmA content for Enfusion, but would have extra features. Here is the link at discussion in STEAM too. PLEASE IF YOU DON´T LIKE VR, or DON´T LIKE ARMA with VR Support, don´t waste time posting here. I know there was a mod attempt in ARMA 3, but the guy didn´t have the access to the core files to modify 3d rendering, i hope we can do it this time.
#VR SUPPORTED VS VR ONLY HOW TO#
We need to throw ideas on how to implement it, to play along with flat screen players, mechanics, etc.
#VR SUPPORTED VS VR ONLY SERIES#
OR it can be done with the Toolbox "Enfusion Workbench".Īlot of people like myself dreamed of The Arma series with VR support, since the whole VR launch and different headsets releases. We need to figure out if the devs are planning in develop VR support by themselves or we can do it, with this engine, i don´t know if the modders community will need access to the engine core files, at least partially. I start this thread, to keep it by now here, if the admins will make a new forum dedicated to Reforger/Arma4 development, please move it there.
0 kommentar(er)
